Did Science Just Prove Spiritual Woo?
A mainstream physics journal just crossed a line most scientists weren’t supposed to cross.
Note: This piece draws from my original ideas, research, hooks, and metaphors. For editing and some wording, I’ve used AI tools trained on my own books and style, always blending technology with my hands-on curation and oversight. Thank you for being here—Jade.
Imagine you’re eight years old, standing at the beach.
You see waves crashing, rising, falling, disappearing.
Some are small. Some are powerful. Some knock you over.
If someone asked you, “Where do waves come from?”
You wouldn’t say, “From nowhere.”
You’d say, “From the ocean.”
Now imagine grown adults arguing for centuries that waves somehow create the ocean.
That’s roughly where we’ve been with consciousness.
The Big Idea
For thousands of years, ancient traditions like Advaita Vedanta and Taoism claimed something radical, that consciousness isn’t something produced by the universe… it’s the ground of the universe itself.
Modern science dismissed this as poetic, mystical, or untestable.
And yet, in 2025, a peer-reviewed paper published in a mainstream physics journal proposed something that would have been unpublishable not long ago:
What if consciousness is a fundamental field of nature, mathematically comparable to gravity or electromagnetism?
Not proven.
Not confirmed.
But taken seriously enough to be modeled.
That alone is worth paying attention to.
The Breakdown
The dominant scientific story goes like this:
First there was matter.
Then complexity.
Then brains.
Then… somehow… awareness appeared.
Consciousness, in this view, is like exhaust smoke from neurons firing.
The official story is: first there was blind matter, then it got complicated, then it built brains… and then, somehow, experience just “emerged.” That last step is usually waved away with a magic word—emergence—as if naming the mystery solved it.
Yes, we know changing the brain changes consciousness, but nobody has ever watched a pile of non‑conscious stuff suddenly light up into a first‑person life from the inside. That jump from matter to me‑ness is still a black box.
We can correlate brain activity with experience.
We cannot yet show how awareness emerges from matter.
That missing step has quietly haunted neuroscience and physics for decades.The Question This Paper Dares to Ask
The paper proposes flipping the story:
What if consciousness doesn’t come from matter?
What if matter comes from consciousness?
Not as a belief.
As a working hypothesis.
To understand it, you need one simple idea.
The Field Analogy
In physics, a field is something that exists everywhere, even when nothing obvious is happening.
Gravity exists even when nothing is falling.
The electromagnetic field exists even when the lights are off.
Particles are not primary.
They are ripples in fields.
This paper suggests:
Consciousness may be a field too.
You are not a machine that creates awareness.
You are a localized ripple in a much larger field of awareness.
Like a wave in the ocean.
The wave has a shape.
A duration.
A perspective.
But when the wave disappears… the ocean remains.
Where the Math Quietly Comes In
The author uses standard quantum field theory language, things like ground states, excitations, symmetry breaking, and information structures.
The math itself is not mystical.
The starting assumption is.
What This Means for the Universe
In this framework, the Big Bang isn’t “something from nothing.”
It’s more like a disturbance in a perfectly still lake.
A shift from undivided potential into patterns, structure, time, and space.
Ancient traditions described this in poetry.
Physics is now asking whether such a story can survive equations.
Why This Sounds Like Ancient Wisdom (And Why That’s Uncomfortable)
Advaita, Taoism, and non-dual philosophies have said for millennia:
Separation is an appearance.
Unity is fundamental.
This paper does not mean ancient sages “knew quantum physics.”
It suggests something subtler:
Humans may have experienced aspects of reality long before we could formalize them.
Phenomenology came first.
Math came later.
This paper doesn’t prove Advaita, but it shows that a consciousness‑first worldview can now be written in the same mathematical dialect as modern physics.
That doesn’t make it true.
But it makes it possible, interesting and in my opinion on a par with materialism which also has not been proven true.
How This Connects to My Previous Work
I’ve written before about:
The brain acting more like a receiver or filter than a generator of consciousness
https://newsletter.nextlevelhuman.com/p/your-brain-is-not-the-source-of-consciousnessQuantum entanglement revealing that separability is not fundamental
Did the Universe Just Send Us a Message?
Those articles do not prove this theory.
They point to cracks in the old materialist story.
This new paper attempts to build a different foundation under those cracks.
It may fail.
That’s allowed in science. It also may change everything and prove the ancients correct.
Why Many Physicists Are Skeptical (And Should Be)
Let’s be clear.
This model:
Does not yet make unique, testable predictions
May be philosophically elegant but experimentally empty
Could turn out to be metaphysics dressed in equations
Skepticism here is healthy.
Curiosity without rigor is just fantasy. If the New Age self-development world wants to be taken seriously it should stop doing that.
Of course it goes both way, rigor without curiosity becomes stagnation. The materialist world of science should stop doing that.
Practical Takeaway
Here’s what actually changes for you, regardless of whether this theory is correct.
If consciousness is fundamental… even possibly… then:
Your inner state matters more than you were taught
Meaning is not a side effect it is a feature
Stories, beliefs, and perception shape biology and behavior from the top down
This aligns with what we see in psychoneuroimmunology, narrative biology, and identity-level change.
Not proof. Not yet.
But a strong emerging pattern.
Closing Thought
For centuries, mystics said consciousness was primary.
Science laughed.
Then science said matter was primary…
and couldn’t explain awareness.
Now, cautiously and without certainty, science is knocking on the same door.
Not to worship.
Not to believe.
But to ask.
What if we’ve been standing in the ocean the whole time… arguing about the waves?
That’s not an answer. But it is an invitation.
PS: If you’re ready to break free of unconscious conditioning and become the kind of person who naturally lives from clarity, coherence, and purpose, explore my Next Level Human coaching program today. Spots are limited… don’t wait. 👉 http://www.nextlevelhuman.com/human-coaching
References
Strømme, M. (2025). Universal consciousness as foundational field: A theoretical bridge between quantum physics and non‑dual philosophy. AIP Advances, 15(11), 115319. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0290984
Zia, D., et al. (2023). Interferometric imaging of amplitude and phase of spatial biphoton states. Nature Photonics, 17, 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01272-3
van Lommel, P., van Wees, R., Meyers, V., & Elfferich, I. (2001). Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest. The Lancet, 358(9298), 2039–2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07100-8
Parnia, S., et al. (2014). AWARE—Awareness during resuscitation. Resuscitation, 85(12), 1799–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.004
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x